Aidan Semmens
  • home
  • about
  • books
  • poems
  • photos
    • landscapes
    • birdlife
    • slideshow
  • contact
  • molly bloom

You couldn't make it up. Or could you?

30/11/2016

0 Comments

 
We’ve been hearing a lot lately about fake news. It’s even been suggested that false stories circulating through social media helped swing the Brexit vote and the US presidential election. I can believe it.

Even for seasoned journalists, it can be difficult to sift out the facts from the heap of misinformation that happens to support whatever you already believe. Others can be taken in by the most preposterous tales.

I’ve seen “news” items from sources such as the Southend News Network and the rather classier Suffolk Gazette passed on as if they were genuine. This is on a par with treating Monty Python as a documentary series, yet some people, it seems, are fooled.

But if the output of these spoof websites is (mostly) fun, there is a much more serious side to the deliberate spreading of  lies and distortions.

Not that it’s a new phenomenon. Certain national newspapers have always been at it – though they do seem to have got more blatant lately.

As a trainee journalist I was taught that the boundary between reporting and opinion had to be very clear at all times. Now that boundary has been smudged to the point where a reader cannot tell news from opinion, fact from fiction.

The selection of what’s considered worth printing – and where – is a crucial factor in swaying public attitudes, too.

The Daily Mail ran its report about Thomas Mair’s conviction for the murder of MP Jo Cox on page 30. A white neo-Nazi jailed for the politically motivated (i.e. terrorist) assassination of a British MP. Page 30. Tucked away between a dull picture story about I’m A Celebrity and one about a Christmas advert.

Might it, perhaps, have made the front page – news-stand visible – if the killer had been a black, Muslim or immigrant terrorist? You know the answer to that.

Where’s the balance here?

But an addiction to supposed balance has its drawbacks too. To put it mildly. Again, the line between fact and opinion – sometimes lunatic opinion – becomes dangerously blurred.

I can’t put it better than one of the world’s finest reporters, Christiane Amanpour of the US news channel CNN.
“I believe in being truthful, not neutral,” she told fellow journalists at the Press Freedom Awards in New York last week.

And she made this vital point: “We cannot continue the old paradigm – let’s say over global warming, where 99.9 per cent of the empirical scientific evidence is given equal play with the tiny minority of deniers.”

I can’t think of a more important subject. Or one where supposed media “balance” has done more drastic harm.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Aidan Semmens, blogger

    the Semmens blog

    A roughly weekly slice on the world and its ways.

    Archives

    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

    Categories

    All
    Bob Dylan
    Brexit
    Changing Times
    Choice
    Class
    Climate Change
    Economics
    Energy
    Environment
    France
    Health
    Historical Context
    Human Rights
    Language
    Media
    My Mother
    Nations
    NHS
    Nuclear Power
    Refugees
    Science
    Sport
    Statistics
    Surveillance
    The Future
    The Internet
    The Wild World
    Tintin
    Travel
    UK Politics
    US Politics

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.